Sportsiology

Public Sociology in a Sports Arena

Good Boys Don’t Cry

I can’t sign off today without commenting on Crygate, as Eric Spoelstra named it (for some reason). First, I have to say that I am surprised that Coach Spoelstra said anything at all. He could have very easily made his point by just saying that his players were emotional after the game. That would have been enough. But he said it and now it’s out there.

So the question obviously arises as to whether the comments since directed at the Miami Heat are a result of our perceived gender roles. I’ve heard people bring up the fact that the NBA is, to use every related cliché I can think of, the No Boys League and, as we all know that boys don’t cry, there should be no crying in basketball. Is it because these players are supposed to be tough and manly, because that is how they have been socialized and how our expected gender roles tell us that men should act? Or is it because it’s too early in the season and not an important enough reason for tears…yet?

 

In making fun of the Heat, other players are able to reinforce their own masculinity. Correspondents also have used odd comparisons to the tears they shed after visiting a children’s cancer ward as a way to give the Heat space for their tears. Other people, like Kobe Bryant and Mike D’Antoni, simply stated that crying doesn’t mean anything, it doesn’t challenge your masculinity, you have an emotional reaction and sometimes tears are part of that. So, what do you think? Nature vs. nurture?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NBA and have No Comments

Ideally Spanish

This weekend I watched several basketball games and, like others noticed the “Spanish” jersey. Before this, I had only ever noticed the Knicks and the Mets using the custom jerseys as a celebration of their Spanish speaking fans. It never even occurred to me to be annoyed by the fact that the jersey’s suddenly had the word “the” on them when they never had before. In the case of the Mets and the Knicks, the lack of translation of the actual team names made sense because, as the name Knicks refers to the Knickerbockers which was a nickname for the first Dutch settlers of New York, there is unlikely to be a Spanish translation (also, I believe the translation that occurred on Knicks jerseys was Nueva York). However, this weekend I noticed the problem. When you have the Bulls and the Heat playing each other, the absurdity in the half-done translation becomes clear. Bulls and heat can actually be translated into Spanish and, since they are already making new jerseys with Spanish words on them, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to change the team name as well.

 

To me, this seems like a conflict between real and ideal culture. America has always had this image as a melting pot. The American Dream is built on the idea that with hard work and healthy dreams, everyone who comes here can achieve their goals. This exported image of America is what we refer to as ideal culture—the idealized version of a group’s culture. Sadly, I think the fact that the team jerseys were only half translated is an example of real culture. While America presents itself as a country where all dreams come true for all people, the jerseys showed the reality—a poor understanding of, a lack of interest in or respect for the Spanish language and, in turn, the people who speak it. Maybe there will be more consideration when the Spanish jerseys are made again…after all, think of how much money could be made from people who actually speak another language when its properly represented on a jersey.

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NBA and have No Comments

Legit or Quit

I was glad to hear this afternoon that 24 hours were added to the NFL labor talks. Like most other sports fans, I wait anxiously every year for football to come back and a stall in labor negotiations, a NFLPA decertification and/or a player lockout would get in the way of that. For me, this process has made me realize that there is no neutral party when it comes to the NFL. The NFL, as I assume other sports do, has a legitimation crisis. Externally, we see the commissioner as upholding football, doing what is in the best interests of the sport for its present and its future. However, the person who holds this authority is also an employee of the owners. It is close to impossible to serve both masters and the legitimacy of the institution is challenged by claiming that a commissioner can. I don’t know if the various sports bodies have ever advertised the lack of separation of commish and owner or whether the general public has ever questioned it but I definitely have concerns now, as I didn’t before, when judgments are made that are supposed to make the league better. But maybe I’m the only one who didn’t realize what the score was…

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NFL and have No Comments

Total Authority

The aspect of the total institution is that is arguably least present in sports is the qualification that “all aspects of life are conducted in the same place under the same single authority.” Each sport has a commissioner, as well as a CBA and other rules governing the sport, and all of the players involved are expected to follow that authority. Depending on the sport, or (most often in the MLB) the team, there are rules which govern dress, action and sometimes even how conversations occur on and off the field, court or ice

Where sports escape the total institution label to some extent is that, in general, they are allowed to conduct aspects of their life outside of their sport. However, when contracts include morality clauses, players’ behavior when they are not at work becomes regulated by the same authority which governs their work.

Additionally, while football players have most of the week to be at home and live their lives as they please, basketball and especially baseball players, spend much more time on the road and often have college dorm like rules that structure their awake and sleeping times (NFL training camp is run similarly). Even in the case of football players, their lives off the court can often be scrutinized by their fans, the media and the league which has a similar effect as being constantly under that authority, as evidenced by the backlash around Roethlisberger’s night out during the super bowl week.

What do you think? Can we say that, despite the option to go home and live beyond the sight of their sport, professional athletes lives are still constantly monitored?

posted by admin in MLB,NBA,NFL and have No Comments

The Inmates and the Asylum

Like others, I heard Dick Vitale last week refer to the inmates running the asylum. This was not the first time I had heard this and while it has most recently been directed at basketball and the string of free agents who have either explicitly or implicitly directed themselves towards particular teams, I have also heard it used to describe players in the NFL whose salaries have set the market and baseball players who have made contract demands on deadlines.

For me, this brings up a couple of issues. First, the phrasing of the “inmates running the asylum” takes me immediately to Erving Goffman’s book, Asylum. In his book of essays, he talks about mental hospitals and what it means to be in a “total institution” and “live an enclosed, formally administered round of life” with “like-situated individuals.” It brought me to think about whether the characteristics of Goffman’s total institution can be applied to the business of sport and the lives of the players.

Additionally, there are the race issues. In most American sport industries, the players—the workers—are minorities (usually, African American although baseball has the unique distinction of being more Latino than African American) and the owners are not. Given this power structure, to refer to the athletes as inmates and to be offended or disgusted that they are gaining some power  and “running the asylum” connects too closely with the idea of a slave revolt.

My ideas around these two issues are forming slowly and I hope to express them here over my next few posts

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in MLB,NBA,NFL,Theorists and have No Comments

Breaking Through

When we think of places where women have faced a glass ceiling, wrestling probably isn’t the first thing that comes to mind. But, girls are not only reaching some of the levels of boys but are competing against them. This year, Iowa has  two women in the state championship and even though ESPN reports that Joel Northrup’s religious convictions forced him to default rather than compete against one of the girls, Cassy Herkelman, its good to know that some headway is being made in this sport.

Apparently, only California, Hawaii, Texas, Washington and Tennessee have leagues just for girls. The other states require mixed groups. Is this the future of sports?

UPDATE:  Both girls lost in their first fight at the state level

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in Other and have No Comments

Learning to Trust

Once you are labeled a liar, you are treated as such. While I would like to believe that the Mets’ Wilpons knew nothing of the Ponzi scheme, simply saying that doesn’t make it so…especially when it comes from Madoff and he says it in the same interview where he calls out the banks for knowing what was going on and not caring. Sorry boys, I just don’t think Bernie’s convincing anyone.

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in MLB and have No Comments

All the Field is a Stage…

For months, we’ve been waiting for the shoe to drop on the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement. Each side has been trying to get us to believe that they are the good guys–they are each practicing impression management.

Erving Goffman tells us that in every interaction we are playing a role. We have a particular audience, a costume, props and a script and we play that role in order to have control over the way that others see us. This is what the NFL owners and the NFL PA have been doing for months. They both want to wear the cape of the hero and place the mustache and evil monocle on their opponent. Every piece of information that is shared or “leaked” allows us to complete the impression of these groups.

When we hear the representatives of the NFLPA tell us of the lack of long term health insurance, the possible injuries as a result of the shorter preseason and longer regular season, and the injustices of changing the profit sharing, the owners become monopoly men, maniacally tapping their fingers on the edges of their over-sized desks.

Goodell promises that he will work for $1 if there is a work stoppage and he becomes a sacrificial lamb. The owners tell us how they are being bled dry and how the NFL PA are presenting “illustrations” instead of “proposals.”

Someone has got to be the hero and someone has to be the villain. Which group is doing the best job of managing your impression of them?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NFL and have Comment (1)