Sportsiology

Public Sociology in a Sports Arena

Whites need not apply

Last week, after BYU was eliminated from contention, reporters asked Jimmer Fredette whether he thought his style would fit well in the NBA. It seemed to me like a perfectly natural question. However, whoever was taking over for Mike Greeneburg the next morning on Mike and Mike (I believe it was Doug Gottlieb), commented that no one asked Kemba Walker the same question. Gottlieb’s explanation was because Fredette is white and Walker is black. The idea that a white man might have more difficulty being drafted into the NBA than a black man might be referred to as reverse racism but, the way many sociologists think about is with a basis in power. The non-dominant group, which in American society is still black men, cannot be racist towards white men because they do not have the power to. Perhaps there is prejudice–the belief that one group is inferior or superior–which leads to discrimination–behavior which differentiates between people based on those prejudice but not racism.

I don’t watch enough NCAA post-game news conferences but could there also be other reasons why Fredette was asked that question? Is it also possible that someone did ask Walker the question and it just didn’t get the same amount of attention?

UPDATE: Jimmer Fredetter wins player of the year. Is this an apology for the previous racism? Or is this a way of saying he is player of the year in the NCAA but probably won’t be in the NBA?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NBA,Other and have No Comments

And the moral is…

According to Emile Durkheim, discipline is the first element of morality. I am reminded of this as I have read these various stories which bring to light elements of morality in college and professional sports. We know that discipline is an important part of sports—all athletes have to have the dedication to put in the work to improve their craft—but is morality? Should programs that emphasize sports also emphasize morality? Interestingly enough, the second element of morality for Durkheim is the attachment to social groups, also described as altruism. As a member of a team, professional athletes at least have the attachment necessary to work with their social group, and many of them, additionally have the altruism that leads them to start and contribute to charities. Yet, too often, we hear stories about their lack of morality. From Miguel Cabrera telling the police to shoot him,toCappie Pondexter tweeting a derogatory term for Japanese people (among other tweets) and even Jim Tressel, and his failure to notify Ohio State’s compliance officer about the potential violations of his students.  Are athletes moral? Do we expect them to be? Or are they, in Lawrence Kohlberg’s stages of moral development, at stage 2 (individualism) where all the good they do is for the benefit of themselves, rather than for others?

And then we have Brandon Davies dismissed from Brigham Young University’s basketball team for failure to comply with the school’s honor code. He admitted to his teammates that he had premarital sex even knowing that the result would be his dismissal. Should we wish for more of sports to uphold this level of morality? Or should we find our moral compasses in other places?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in MLB,Other and have No Comments