Sportsiology

Public Sociology in a Sports Arena

Archive for June, 2011

Knocking it Over

I watch some hockey, generally my local team and, more during the playoffs or if there are no other sports on. But I will admit that I was kind of cheering for the Canucks. They hadn’t won and I’m always in favor of anyone beating Boston at anything but…wow…was I surprised by the riots. Perhaps—despite my intention to always exhibit cultural relativity and see each culture as a member of that culture would see it and not as a representative of my own—I held a few stereotypes of Canadians as a whole (even with the understanding that, like us, they are a large and diverse country). As Americans, we often see them as nice, quiet people…and certainly non-violent. But, they can riot with the best of them. And I was extremely surprised to hear this wasn’t the first time this had happened.

Sports riots are really interesting examples of collective behavior. I wish I could have seen it unfold. Does it begin with one individual who accidentally sets fire to something? Does it start as aggressive chanting while watching the game? The behavior of a crowd usually begins with an emotion and there is little that is more emotional than a crowd of people forced to react to “their team” for hours with each other. Seeing others participating in the same behavior can also make it seem less deviant and, one often assumes, more anonymous. I’m sure it was surprising to everyone when participating individuals started to be identified online…

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Relax…Release…

While we often think about deviance as being a negative for society, there are many sociologists who recognizehttp://www.wpclipart.com/cartoon/people/kids/boy_cartoons/more_boys/punch_in_the_eye_2.png.html a purpose for it. Durkhiem says that one of the four functions of deviance is to release tension, and while sporting events shouldn’t be deviant, fans do participate in deviant acts during sporting events like they wouldn’t any other place. The negative interactions that fans can have with players (like the events which led to the brawl at The Palace or Charles Barkley and the Miami fans or with each other (the Giants fan beat up in Dodgers stadium, the little kid in the Jets uniform tackled by a Browns fan represent, what we hope, is abnormal behavior in the non-sports life of sports fans. One hopes that because they have the release of the game, and the drinks and the rowdiness (or in other cultures, the hooliganism), they can control those urges in other places. I think the big question here is why are sporting events an allowable place for this? It seems as though there is historical precedence for this—the amount of rowdiness displayed by the Greek during arena fights comes to mind—but is this really why Jet fans at Gate D at Giants Stadium used to grope women and request flashing during halftime?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in MLB,NBA,NFL and have No Comments

Under New Management

I’ve spoken before about dramaturgy and the fact that we represent ourselves the way we want to be seen. I mentioned the NFL owners and unions who wanted to make sure that the other person is seen as the bad guy. But what about players? What kind of impression management do they participate in? Masculinity seems to be a big one. I was surprised by the number of stories that came out, one after another, about players not seeming tough or hard or participating in some kind of behavior that is deemed not manly enough. But there are other things. What about Jay Cutler not seeming upset when he couldn’t get back into the game? Or all the times announcers say that they can tell when the team or players aren’t into it? The most recent example was last night’s game. I heard on the radio that some people felt that LeBron’s pregame speech was faked, that he was playing to the cameras. Is this something else that athletes have to do? Do they have to take each game as life and death because we fans see it that way and we want to know that they do too? And when they don’t, when they seem tired or don’t play as we expected, do we decide that they don’t take the game seriously and will therefore not have success? I wonder if this encourages them to pretend and play their role so they audience will come to their games and buy their jerseys. And if it doesn’t, why not?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NBA,NFL and have No Comments

Its all relative…

I know I’m a little late to the game (its been an insane month) but we are showing more and more how deviance is relative and how, as times changes, what outrages us changes too. Twenty years ago (maybe even 15 years ago) would the slurs of Joakim Noah and Kobe Bryant had the reactions that they did? Would the bigger reactions be against Sean Avery’s and Steve Nash’s support of the gay marriage bill in New York or Avery’s agent who chastised him for making his opinion known?

I don’t know if, as Charles Barkley claimed, current male athletes would be perfectly fine with openly gay teammates but the players, owners and managers who have come out recently also haven’t gotten the backlash that they may have years ago. The line that separates what is deviant from what is not for much of mainstream America (or at least mainstream sporting America) seems to have shifted…I’m looking forward to seeing where it is in another 2o years.

posted by admin in NBA,NHL and have No Comments

Making Private Public

C. Wright Mills encourages sociologists to make a connection between biography and history to be able to see themselves within larger societal structures. He specifically asks that social scientists connect private concerns with public issues in order to glance outside of the intricacies of individuals’ lives into the social institutions within which we exist. While the personal issues and concerns of athletes and sports teams are often aired in public, and public groups and authorities can get involved, we, as sports fans don’t make as many connections to public issues as we should. That is really much of the purpose of this blog, to bring us out of our own lives, teams and loyalties and to allow us to see the bigger pictures. Is Kobe’s homophobic slur only a public issue because it was accidentally overheard or does it represent the larger issues around sports and masculinity and the ways in which we equate homosexuality with the lack of such? Is the robot that will throw out the pitch at the Phillies game just a publicity stunt or an example of American society’s move into the biotech society that we have been promised, where we are able to use technology to overcome biological limitations? When your sociological imagination becomes second nature, we won’t have to ask these questions anymore.

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in MLB,NBA and have No Comments