Sportsiology

Public Sociology in a Sports Arena

Archive for March, 2011

Whites need not apply

Last week, after BYU was eliminated from contention, reporters asked Jimmer Fredette whether he thought his style would fit well in the NBA. It seemed to me like a perfectly natural question. However, whoever was taking over for Mike Greeneburg the next morning on Mike and Mike (I believe it was Doug Gottlieb), commented that no one asked Kemba Walker the same question. Gottlieb’s explanation was because Fredette is white and Walker is black. The idea that a white man might have more difficulty being drafted into the NBA than a black man might be referred to as reverse racism but, the way many sociologists think about is with a basis in power. The non-dominant group, which in American society is still black men, cannot be racist towards white men because they do not have the power to. Perhaps there is prejudice–the belief that one group is inferior or superior–which leads to discrimination–behavior which differentiates between people based on those prejudice but not racism.

I don’t watch enough NCAA post-game news conferences but could there also be other reasons why Fredette was asked that question? Is it also possible that someone did ask Walker the question and it just didn’t get the same amount of attention?

UPDATE: Jimmer Fredetter wins player of the year. Is this an apology for the previous racism? Or is this a way of saying he is player of the year in the NCAA but probably won’t be in the NBA?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NBA,Other and have No Comments

I’ll be doggone

Several weeks ago, Michael Vick and Peyton Hillis were making the rounds on ESPN. This always brings people back to Vick’s legal issues and the behavior that led to them. As I didn’t get a chance to weigh in at the time, I’d like to share a perspective on what led to his behavior. When a new member is being inducted into a particular society, they are socialized by the people around them. The begins with their significant others–the people who are important to them–but eventually move to the larger community and during the formative years, the peers become the most important agency of socialization. If an individual’s family, either buys into the same values and behaviors as a child’s peers or has not instilled opposing perspectives into the child, the child is likely to allow their peers to socialize them to the values of that sub- or counter-culture.

Additionally, the theory of differential association states that people learn criminal behavior from associating with people who participate in it. Not only do you learn the actual skills required to participate in criminal activities but you also learn the moral code that allows you justify the deviant acts. If one’s exposure to these alternative moralities is greater than the exposure to more conventional moralities, the individual is likely to participate in these types of activities. I don’t know enough about Vick’s family life to say definitively, but it would seem to me that a strong moral foundation would have made what he did almost impossible.

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NFL and have No Comments

And the moral is…

According to Emile Durkheim, discipline is the first element of morality. I am reminded of this as I have read these various stories which bring to light elements of morality in college and professional sports. We know that discipline is an important part of sports—all athletes have to have the dedication to put in the work to improve their craft—but is morality? Should programs that emphasize sports also emphasize morality? Interestingly enough, the second element of morality for Durkheim is the attachment to social groups, also described as altruism. As a member of a team, professional athletes at least have the attachment necessary to work with their social group, and many of them, additionally have the altruism that leads them to start and contribute to charities. Yet, too often, we hear stories about their lack of morality. From Miguel Cabrera telling the police to shoot him,toCappie Pondexter tweeting a derogatory term for Japanese people (among other tweets) and even Jim Tressel, and his failure to notify Ohio State’s compliance officer about the potential violations of his students.  Are athletes moral? Do we expect them to be? Or are they, in Lawrence Kohlberg’s stages of moral development, at stage 2 (individualism) where all the good they do is for the benefit of themselves, rather than for others?

And then we have Brandon Davies dismissed from Brigham Young University’s basketball team for failure to comply with the school’s honor code. He admitted to his teammates that he had premarital sex even knowing that the result would be his dismissal. Should we wish for more of sports to uphold this level of morality? Or should we find our moral compasses in other places?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in MLB,Other and have No Comments

Good Boys Don’t Cry

I can’t sign off today without commenting on Crygate, as Eric Spoelstra named it (for some reason). First, I have to say that I am surprised that Coach Spoelstra said anything at all. He could have very easily made his point by just saying that his players were emotional after the game. That would have been enough. But he said it and now it’s out there.

So the question obviously arises as to whether the comments since directed at the Miami Heat are a result of our perceived gender roles. I’ve heard people bring up the fact that the NBA is, to use every related cliché I can think of, the No Boys League and, as we all know that boys don’t cry, there should be no crying in basketball. Is it because these players are supposed to be tough and manly, because that is how they have been socialized and how our expected gender roles tell us that men should act? Or is it because it’s too early in the season and not an important enough reason for tears…yet?

 

In making fun of the Heat, other players are able to reinforce their own masculinity. Correspondents also have used odd comparisons to the tears they shed after visiting a children’s cancer ward as a way to give the Heat space for their tears. Other people, like Kobe Bryant and Mike D’Antoni, simply stated that crying doesn’t mean anything, it doesn’t challenge your masculinity, you have an emotional reaction and sometimes tears are part of that. So, what do you think? Nature vs. nurture?

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NBA and have No Comments

Ideally Spanish

This weekend I watched several basketball games and, like others noticed the “Spanish” jersey. Before this, I had only ever noticed the Knicks and the Mets using the custom jerseys as a celebration of their Spanish speaking fans. It never even occurred to me to be annoyed by the fact that the jersey’s suddenly had the word “the” on them when they never had before. In the case of the Mets and the Knicks, the lack of translation of the actual team names made sense because, as the name Knicks refers to the Knickerbockers which was a nickname for the first Dutch settlers of New York, there is unlikely to be a Spanish translation (also, I believe the translation that occurred on Knicks jerseys was Nueva York). However, this weekend I noticed the problem. When you have the Bulls and the Heat playing each other, the absurdity in the half-done translation becomes clear. Bulls and heat can actually be translated into Spanish and, since they are already making new jerseys with Spanish words on them, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to change the team name as well.

 

To me, this seems like a conflict between real and ideal culture. America has always had this image as a melting pot. The American Dream is built on the idea that with hard work and healthy dreams, everyone who comes here can achieve their goals. This exported image of America is what we refer to as ideal culture—the idealized version of a group’s culture. Sadly, I think the fact that the team jerseys were only half translated is an example of real culture. While America presents itself as a country where all dreams come true for all people, the jerseys showed the reality—a poor understanding of, a lack of interest in or respect for the Spanish language and, in turn, the people who speak it. Maybe there will be more consideration when the Spanish jerseys are made again…after all, think of how much money could be made from people who actually speak another language when its properly represented on a jersey.

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NBA and have No Comments

Legit or Quit

I was glad to hear this afternoon that 24 hours were added to the NFL labor talks. Like most other sports fans, I wait anxiously every year for football to come back and a stall in labor negotiations, a NFLPA decertification and/or a player lockout would get in the way of that. For me, this process has made me realize that there is no neutral party when it comes to the NFL. The NFL, as I assume other sports do, has a legitimation crisis. Externally, we see the commissioner as upholding football, doing what is in the best interests of the sport for its present and its future. However, the person who holds this authority is also an employee of the owners. It is close to impossible to serve both masters and the legitimacy of the institution is challenged by claiming that a commissioner can. I don’t know if the various sports bodies have ever advertised the lack of separation of commish and owner or whether the general public has ever questioned it but I definitely have concerns now, as I didn’t before, when judgments are made that are supposed to make the league better. But maybe I’m the only one who didn’t realize what the score was…

posted by Sociology Sports Girl in NFL and have No Comments

Total Authority

The aspect of the total institution is that is arguably least present in sports is the qualification that “all aspects of life are conducted in the same place under the same single authority.” Each sport has a commissioner, as well as a CBA and other rules governing the sport, and all of the players involved are expected to follow that authority. Depending on the sport, or (most often in the MLB) the team, there are rules which govern dress, action and sometimes even how conversations occur on and off the field, court or ice

Where sports escape the total institution label to some extent is that, in general, they are allowed to conduct aspects of their life outside of their sport. However, when contracts include morality clauses, players’ behavior when they are not at work becomes regulated by the same authority which governs their work.

Additionally, while football players have most of the week to be at home and live their lives as they please, basketball and especially baseball players, spend much more time on the road and often have college dorm like rules that structure their awake and sleeping times (NFL training camp is run similarly). Even in the case of football players, their lives off the court can often be scrutinized by their fans, the media and the league which has a similar effect as being constantly under that authority, as evidenced by the backlash around Roethlisberger’s night out during the super bowl week.

What do you think? Can we say that, despite the option to go home and live beyond the sight of their sport, professional athletes lives are still constantly monitored?

posted by admin in MLB,NBA,NFL and have No Comments